> But I wonder how much resistance you would get from the military, veterans, military families, and so on who make the argument that for every robot we make a

> But I wonder how much resistance you would get from the military, veterans, military families, and so on who make the argument that for every robot we make a human soldier doesn't have to be put at risk. But can't the same argument apply to biological and chemical weapons? How did it come to be, that there are treaties banning them?