4 ms·
I've been working with open source software since before the term existed (it used to be called "free" before licensing was understood.) At this point, I think
by MrTonyD 11y ago
I've been working with open source software since before the term existed (it used to be called "free" before licensing was understood.) At this point, I think it is mostly a bad idea. First, the big users of most open source software are big Fortune 500 companies run by a bunch of billionaires - so why should they get software free? Second, I think that everyone should get at least a living wage for any work they do - so working for free really reflects an economic system that was set up to create winners and losers.
So now I would prefer to see more managed economies - less tolerance for the billionares, and less tolerance for a system where people must work for free to get the chance to get a good job.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoit used to be called "free" before licensing was understood This statement along with saying free software means "working for free" and that Fortune 500 companies being large adopters of free software isn't preferable, makes me strongly doubt you ever understood it in the first place.