3 ms·
I am acutely aware of HAProxy however the rest of the team is, no surprise I'm sure, familiar with nginx. Likely I'll end up doing the usual nginx->haproxy->ba
by Rapzid 11y ago
I am acutely aware of HAProxy however the rest of the team is, no surprise I'm sure, familiar with nginx. Likely I'll end up doing the usual nginx->haproxy->backend chain again. HAPROXY appears to have an enterprise now(it may have had forever I just have not noticed) but it appears to be much more focused on value-add support and stack validation than hiding simple-to-implement stuff behind a paywall and open-core. This is more of a frustration with nginx which could be so much more for us if:
* They were not purposely holding back features so they can be pay-walled
* Re-compiling were not necessary to add functionality
* More cohesive modification ecosystem
I know I said "reverse proxy" which HAProxy is cleary the more superior, but I didn't mean to limit my statement to reverse proxies. nginx does have a lot of other functionality people rely on..
- Tenzer 11y agoDynamic modules are on the road map, according to this article: http://www.infoworld.com/article/2951849/web-services/nginx-to-hop-on-http-2-train.html http://www.infoworld.com/article/2951849/web-services/nginx-....