I feel like I've read a pamphlet. With enough enthusiasm most structural changes can be interpreted as politically driven to spin opposition. Look at the stre

I feel like I've read a pamphlet. With enough enthusiasm most structural changes can be interpreted as politically driven to spin opposition. Look at the stretch he made just to suggest Thiel might be sexist. Or that he somehow connects general libertarianism with the ignorance of copyright restrictions. (Which is just polemic and wrong. It's controversial and even Rand was a big fan.) He believes it becomes harder to differentiate between Kim Dotcom and warlords? How out of touch is that?