4 ms·
You're right, if the crime was clearly committed by multiple assailants you need to find another killer. But the OP throws out the evidence that indicates mult
by herdrick 17y ago
You're right, if the crime was clearly committed by multiple assailants you need to find another killer. But the OP throws out the evidence that indicates multiple assailants.
False written statements are often signed in police stations.
- heyitsnick 17y agoCould you quote the parts of the article that "throws out the evidence that indicates multiple assailants"? Specifically parts of the article that discredit the body of evidence from the Judge's report (http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/tjmk/comments/understanding_micheli_2_why_judge_micheli_rejected_the_lone_wolf_theory/ http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/tjmk/comments/under...) that supports a multiple-assailant theory?
- herdrick 17y agoHe appears to ignore such evidence, assuming it exists. I don't know much about the case; I'm interested in the OP's model of thinking about cases.