>This is the problem with reporting in general --it's full of half truths and poorly researched pieces I largely agree with you, and it's very possible that th

>This is the problem with reporting in general --it's full of half truths and poorly researched pieces I largely agree with you, and it's very possible that the original nytimes article is questionable. But a lot of what you said ("poorly researched", "want to forward an agenda") can be said about this article too. Not even attempting to interview the subject of the article (I assume that's what happened based on this tweet: https://twitter.com/SarahMaslinNir/status/625085019199934464 https://twitter.com/SarahMaslinNir/status/625085019199934464) is very poor journalistic standards. Instead of getting caught in the middle of these two journalists, I'm going to wait for more, solid evidence.