4 ms·
heres the ad in question: https://twitter.com/michaelluo/status/625082960547610626 https://twitter.com/michaelluo/status/625082960547610626 the author of this
by aaronkrolik 11y ago
heres the ad in question: https://twitter.com/michaelluo/status/625082960547610626 https://twitter.com/michaelluo/status/625082960547610626
the author of this post never interviewed the NYT reporter. or her editor
- KaoruAoiShiho 11y agoWhat am I looking at? It clearly says $75 right there not $10.
- thaumasiotes 11y agoOn the reporter's twitter, it is claimed that the ad says $75/day for a worker with experience, and $10 for one without. However, you'd have to take their word for it, because despite saying very aggrieved things about how the ad Bernstein doubted DOES REALLY EXIST, and HERE'S A PICTURE OF IT... nobody has posted a picture with legible text. I find it personally disturbing that so many people want to view that image as evidence of anything at all. :/ The character 學 ("study") is visible before an occurrence of $10 in the text, so it's reasonably likely that they're telling the truth about what it says. It's left as an exercise to say why paying your untrained interns $10 / day is so much worse for them than the conventional US practice of paying them nothing.
- Retra 11y agoUnpaid internships in the US are mostly illegal except under some fairly contrived circumstances.
- GFK_of_xmaspast 11y agoThey're also all over the place in SV.