4 ms·
There's a famous, and depressing, quote about newspapers by Micheal Crichton that fits here: Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You op
by bradleyjg 11y ago
There's a famous, and depressing, quote about newspapers by Micheal Crichton that fits here:
Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.
The full essay appears here:
http://larvatus.com/michael-crichton-why-speculate/ http://larvatus.com/michael-crichton-why-speculate/
- mc32 11y agoI think there is validity to that argument. Journalists are essentially writers --but writers with short deadlines, so they don't have time to research as normal writers might, in order to have a cursory understanding of what they are writing about and present it with understanding of the subject --be it astrophysics or social sciences. In addition, most publications have political tendencies and aren't typically totally disinterested.