Actually, I agree with the previous post; and I'm the former maintainer of the mini2440 architecture (which used the SoC that board inherits from). arm9 are a

Actually, I agree with the previous post; and I'm the former maintainer of the mini2440 architecture (which used the SoC that board inherits from). arm9 are a bit lame, and /ancient/ -- you can at least get a cortex a8 or so. A 400mhz arm9 is also dog slow. Also, on every single previous friendlyarm board, they tried to push their proprietary crap bootloader, until I ported u-boot in 2008 or so, but every single board afterward, they tried to push their binaries... .. down to shipping kernel sources with '.fo' files for drivers (!!!) -- as object files! For a bit of history on this, do read my old blog: http://bliterness.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/mini210s-and-open-source-issues.html http://bliterness.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/mini210s-and-open-s...