4 ms·
> including massive siphons that literally pull the water over mountain ranges. I don't think that is physically possible. Water won't siphon more than 33ish v
by function_seven 11y ago
> including massive siphons that literally pull the water over mountain ranges.
I don't think that is physically possible. Water won't siphon more than 33ish vertical feet. It will just draw a vacuum in the pipe.
EDIT: Found a good link. The word "siphon" is quoted on every use in this link, suggesting that they're not actual gravity-powered siphons. See #10. http://www.kcet.org/news/redefine/revisit/commentary/concrete-and-chaparral/a-self-guided-tour-of-the-los-angeles-aqueduct.html http://www.kcet.org/news/redefine/revisit/commentary/concret...
EDIT2: Ok, they are gravity-powered, but not by the "pulling" action of the water on the downslope side of the siphon, as much as by the pushing action of the previous downward slope feeding into the siphon. Technically, it's still a siphon i guess, just operating at higher than atmospheric pressure.
- stcredzero 11y agoSiphons that are an inverted U have this limit. However, siphons that are a U shape have been in use in aqueducts since Roman times. (There is even an old Scientific American article specifically about them.) Of course, these aren't relevant for getting over mountains, though they are very relevant in mountain ranges for crossing gorges and steep valleys.
- function_seven 11y agoYeah, I just went on an edit frenzy after you replied. Thanks.