4 ms·
> Skylake (2016) and Sandy Bridge (2010) have roughly comparable single core desktop benchmarks. That's not quite true -- Intel aims for a big IPC (instruction
by cfallin 11y ago
> Skylake (2016) and Sandy Bridge (2010) have roughly comparable single core desktop benchmarks.
That's not quite true -- Intel aims for a big IPC (instructions/clock) improvement for each "tock" generation (Nehalem -> Sandy Bridge -> Haswell -> Skylake), and IIRC has pretty much delivered. Some benchmarks are really hard to push because they're memory/cache-miss bound (so it's really just about throwing in more memory channels and clocking them up), but a lot of things have gotten seriously better for tricky integer code, especially in e.g. branch prediction/uop cache in the frontend and available execution ports in the backend.
- hajile 11y agohttp://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/07/intel-confirms-tick-tock-shattering-kaby-lake-processor-as-moores-law-falters/ http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/07/intel-confirms-tick-t... While the headline is hyperbole, the fact is that Intel has passively admitted that newer process sizes are taking more time to achieve.