First, it's irrelevant to my point whether evolutionary psychology is not a hard science. When someone ignores, prohibits or shame a field using name-calling a

First, it's irrelevant to my point whether evolutionary psychology is not a hard science. When someone ignores, prohibits or shame a field using name-calling and fallacious axioms, arguments/debates are irrelevant and you have to run. Secondly, what you've described is a problem in the social sciences not exclusive to evolutionary psychology. Some economic theories, for example, are largely debatable and, for some scholars, full of baseless speculation.