Sorry for late reply! >It's as if you do not understand that Theo did not comment on that LWN page... The comments in question where in large responses to The

Sorry for late reply! >It's as if you do not understand that Theo did not comment on that LWN page... The comments in question where in large responses to Theo's claim, which in turn was part of the article on which the comments are based. Vezzy-fnord used this to paint LWN comment section as being populated by narrow-minded, Linux-centric people with vendetta's, totally ignoring that the comments by 'spender' were perfectly in line with the comments typically uttered by Theo, whose solution was under discussion. And as to further underline how this was all bs from start to finish on Vezzy-fnord's part, the guy in question (spender) who was making the aggressive criticism is not some Linux zealot, he is criticizing Linux security solutions in exactly the same manner.