6 ms·

Why not use gulp to build static html pages, and serve those with S3/CloudFront. Simpler, more reliable, and no need to run a node service.

by elmin 11y ago

MadRabbit 11y ago
because that's an extra moving part, i will have to handle those compiled files separately, collect them somewhere, copy to S3 or whatevers. I don't want that. I want a simple thing that has just the content and a shallow presentation layer that just shows the content in a browser, that's it. No extra transformations or anything, this way the system is immediate and simple. markdown + front-end, no other moving parts
- jeena 11y ago
  You're doing that with the atom.xml already anyway. Your approach right now doesn't seem to work with search engines very well: https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks#hl=en&q=site:http:%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2... https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.r... https://yandex.ru/search/?lr=114311&text=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks%20How%20I%20Blog%20Now https://yandex.ru/search/?lr=114311&text=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2... http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+how+i+blog+now&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=9a34c93494e34f40992d3b240500606e http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.roc... https://se.search.yahoo.com/search?p=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now&fr=yfp-t-925 https://se.search.yahoo.com/search?p=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnik...
  - MadRabbit 11y ago
    looks like it works perfectly
    - jeena 11y ago
      Hm, really? When I click on those links they all show me that they didn't find anything. Ok I see that google did find what I was looking for, I wasn't expecting that. But none of the other search engine did for me. I only got: "No more results.", "По вашему запросу ничего не нашлось", "No results found for site:http://nikolay.rocks http://nikolay.rocks How I Blog Now." and "We did not find results for: site:http://nikolay.rocks http://nikolay.rocks How I Blog Now." When I remove "sites:" from the query then they all find this page on GitHub: https://github.com/MadRabbit/nikolay.rocks/commit/58a90810f1c1bad5e95659e3516c9b03b2771df4?short_path=f2f4e07 https://github.com/MadRabbit/nikolay.rocks/commit/58a90810f1... But that doesn't seem like a nice thing to read, I mean it is better than nothing, but to do that you wouldn't need your own domain and all the JavaScript.

Why not use gulp to build static html pages, and serve those with S3/CloudFront. Simpler, more reliable, and no need to run a node service.

by elmin 11y ago

Why not use gulp to build static html pages, and serve those with S3/CloudFront. Simpler, more reliable, and no need to run a node service.

MadRabbit 11y ago

because that's an extra moving part, i will have to handle those compiled files separately, collect them somewhere, copy to S3 or whatevers. I don't want that. I want a simple thing that has just the content and a shallow presentation layer that just shows the content in a browser, that's it. No extra transformations or anything, this way the system is immediate and simple. markdown + front-end, no other moving parts

jeena 11y ago
You're doing that with the atom.xml already anyway. Your approach right now doesn't seem to work with search engines very well: https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks#hl=en&q=site:http:%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now https://encrypted.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2... https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now https://duckduckgo.com/?t=lm&q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.r... https://yandex.ru/search/?lr=114311&text=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks%20How%20I%20Blog%20Now https://yandex.ru/search/?lr=114311&text=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2... http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+how+i+blog+now&sc=0-0&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=9a34c93494e34f40992d3b240500606e http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.roc... https://se.search.yahoo.com/search?p=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnikolay.rocks+How+I+Blog+Now&fr=yfp-t-925 https://se.search.yahoo.com/search?p=site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fnik...
- MadRabbit 11y ago
  looks like it works perfectly
  - jeena 11y ago
    Hm, really? When I click on those links they all show me that they didn't find anything. Ok I see that google did find what I was looking for, I wasn't expecting that. But none of the other search engine did for me. I only got: "No more results.", "По вашему запросу ничего не нашлось", "No results found for site:http://nikolay.rocks http://nikolay.rocks How I Blog Now." and "We did not find results for: site:http://nikolay.rocks http://nikolay.rocks How I Blog Now." When I remove "sites:" from the query then they all find this page on GitHub: https://github.com/MadRabbit/nikolay.rocks/commit/58a90810f1c1bad5e95659e3516c9b03b2771df4?short_path=f2f4e07 https://github.com/MadRabbit/nikolay.rocks/commit/58a90810f1... But that doesn't seem like a nice thing to read, I mean it is better than nothing, but to do that you wouldn't need your own domain and all the JavaScript.