3 ms·
To the author: Way to contribute to .NET's image problem with your negative title. If your point is to get more people using .NET then you should have gone with
by WorldWideWayne 11y ago
To the author: Way to contribute to .NET's image problem with your negative title. If your point is to get more people using .NET then you should have gone with something positive that reflected the last section of your article.
To the mods here: Didn't think to change this one, did you?
- dang 11y ago> To the mods here: Didn't think to change this one, did you? We took "profound" out (we often remove superlatives and the like), but I don't see anything else that needs changing here. It isn't gratuitously negative to claim or discuss weakness.
- WorldWideWayne 11y agoIt was taken out after I said it then.
- dang 11y agoOh yes, I didn't mean to imply otherwise. If that's the bit you were objecting to, I apologize for misreading your comment.