3 ms·
Isn't the Chrome sandbox a better assurance than Chrome-under-Docker? Except for the obscurity angle of course (nobody writes exploits against Chrome-under-Doc
by zorked 11y ago
Isn't the Chrome sandbox a better assurance than Chrome-under-Docker?
Except for the obscurity angle of course (nobody writes exploits against Chrome-under-Docker).
To be fair, VMs are also mostly about the obscurity angle too, and if you do all your browing in a VM the cookies alone will make the attacker sufficiently happy that they will probably not care. People don't hack because they want root on the bare-metal OS, people hack because they want to steal data. If it's in a VM or container, then getting there is enough.
- georgerobinson 11y ago> Isn't the Chrome sandbox a better assurance than Chrome-under-Docker? Sorry, are you referring to Native Client or Chrome's site isolation?