4 ms·
I'd say it's more like a courtesy than a fundamental requirement. Obviously Chrome has overstepped the mark here, but you can't just perpetually support entrenc
by Cakez0r 11y ago
I'd say it's more like a courtesy than a fundamental requirement. Obviously Chrome has overstepped the mark here, but you can't just perpetually support entrenched bugs otherwise you end up with a browser like internet explorer.
- ajross 11y agoEverything is relative, and surely there are some misfeatures that simply can't be handled gracefully. But broadly, no: if some user wants to hit a archived site from 1995 using Chrome 44, I think virtually everyone would expect that to work and not fail. To take your extrapolation in the other direction: you're arguing that if we want to hit old stuff that we need to do it in a VM running Windows 98 and IE4.