I doubt you were actually consistently paying $30-100 per month on new music. The average consumer spends roughly $60 a year on recorded music. Now, instead o

I doubt you were actually consistently paying $30-100 per month on new music. The average consumer spends roughly $60 a year on recorded music. Now, instead of building 'equity' in a music collection that you own, you'll be renting your music at $10/mo for eternity. Which do you think will end up costing more in the long run?