That looks really neat. I had wondered about using S3 for backups. I'll definitely have to try it out. It looks like the "Plus" service's block-level access a

That looks really neat. I had wondered about using S3 for backups. I'll definitely have to try it out. It looks like the "Plus" service's block-level access and transfer resume would pay for itself pretty quickly with a reasonable volume of data ($1/month vs 0.10 or 0.18 per GB up/down), besides being worth it for $1 anyway.