Or maybe it's 70% of the students who pick 6. Or 99%. Or maybe 10.01%. The point is we don't know and can only speculate, just like the students in the exper

Or maybe it's 70% of the students who pick 6. Or 99%. Or maybe 10.01%. The point is we don't know and can only speculate, just like the students in the experiment who don't have the signal either. It kind of sounds like you want to believe the professor has a bias, and are trying to speculate evidence to support that belief. Even in the article he talks about how picking 6 in the first round isn't viewed as selfish, just that this experiment demonstrates tragedy of the commons.