3 ms·
I'm curious as to what happened here: Text entered: this is a test of handwriting generation Style sample #1 selected. All other settings at default. http:/
by fallinghawks 11y ago
I'm curious as to what happened here:
Text entered: this is a test of handwriting generation
Style sample #1 selected.
All other settings at default.
http://imgur.com/6b1G5Tj http://imgur.com/6b1G5Tj
Edit: I've tried a couple other styles and haven't duplicated this craziness.
- profinger 11y agoThe network that picked up that task was just a little wacky. No big deal. Look the other way. Please ignore. whistle lol
- niccaluim 11y agoThe world's first artificial neural network with a drinking problem :)
- CatharticMonkey 11y agoIt obviously gets bored sometimes and decides it'd rather draw pretty pictures of mountain ranges or something. http://imgur.com/uz60af1 http://imgur.com/uz60af1
- fallinghawks 11y agoHumans doodle, so it does too, I guess :)
- Houshalter 11y agoThere's an element of randomness in the generated samples. It does what it predicts a human would do. If it thinks there is a 1% chance a human would do move the cursor up, then it will have a 1% chance of doing that as well. Since the net can't really be 100% sure of anything, it leaves itself a little uncertainty in case the human does something crazy. So sometimes the result will seem to be a little random than real writing because of it's uncertainty. The bias parameter tries to fix this by biasing it's output towards more probable sequences. I don't know what data it's using - it's quite possible it's corrupted by people drawing randomly or something.