I think that the prosecutor was oblivious to all evidences because the "victim" was a woman. All such cases follow this pattern, woman is the alleged victim, m

I think that the prosecutor was oblivious to all evidences because the "victim" was a woman. All such cases follow this pattern, woman is the alleged victim, man is convicted, 2 years later details made public regarding disregarded evidence, man released. That's my perception. Just like people can say "she was not promoted because she's a woman" or "he was pulled over because he's black" I can say "she was believed unconditionally because she's a woman".