4 ms·
Having watched the two short videos I really don't see any obvious things they could have hidden there. The audio (which I presume is the important part) appear
by DangerousPie 11y ago
Having watched the two short videos I really don't see any obvious things they could have hidden there. The audio (which I presume is the important part) appears to keep on going, while a short segment of the video repeats. They also mention in the article that "The audio ends more than a minute before the video images do. "
So to me this just sounds like some small parts of the video got repeated by accident, leading to a slightly "extended" video that becomes out of sync with the audio.
But maybe I'm being too naive here, I don't actually know the backstory of this.
- lentil_soup 11y agowell, potentially the audio could be edited as well, which is much easier to fake than video
- duncan_bayne 11y agoOr, as I've read elsewhere, you pad unimportant sections of the video by looping, then cut out a few short important bits, and the overall length is unchanged.
- DangerousPie 11y agoBut the length is actually increased by about a minute from the sound of it. Unless they also cut some parts of the audio but then forgot to match the length up again, which seems like a really weird mistake to make...
- DanBC 11y ago> So to me this just sounds like some small parts of the video got repeated by accident, How? Is this an error for any camera or recording software? It feels like it can only happen after editing, and the fact that edits happened make people wonder about what was edited out.
- imaginenore 11y agoAudio is very easy to cut seamlessly.
- 8ig8 11y agoI think this post was the first to call out the _edits_. It provides a few more details than the LA Times article, I think... http://bennorton.com/dashcam-video-of-violent-arrest-of-sandra-bland-was-edited/ http://bennorton.com/dashcam-video-of-violent-arrest-of-sand...