4 ms·
Agreed that the fact it's continuously changing is an additional issue, but I don't see the "eventually you start working with curves" argument. Where are these
by Osmium 11y ago
Agreed that the fact it's continuously changing is an additional issue, but I don't see the "eventually you start working with curves" argument. Where are these curves on a typical coastline?
If you're measuring the coastline on a map, that argument holds, but the map is only one representation of the reality, and they've already made decisions regarding minimum feature size implicit in the construction of the map.
But yes, also agreed that measuring rivers should be fine, because you can represent it as a one-dimensional line along the 'centre of mass' of each segment of the river, which should give well-defined values regardless of what the 'edges' of the river look like.
- zamalek 11y ago> Where are these curves on a typical coastline? Between atom nuclei.
- Osmium 11y agoHow so? Do you fit the positions of your nuclei to a spline to get your curve? How about quantum uncertainty in its position? How do you assign whether a given nuclei belongs to the 'coast' or to the 'sea', etc. I don't think it holds.
- zamalek 11y ago> How about quantum uncertainty in its position? Aw crap, really good point. You're right.