5 ms·
I also feel the the GPL Affero licence (the GPL response to this, by re-wording it so that you still have to share the source if it's a webapp) is not very clea
by Tyr42 11y ago
I also feel the the GPL Affero licence (the GPL response to this, by re-wording it so that you still have to share the source if it's a webapp) is not very clear. I know the company I'm working at is willing to be a good GPL citizen, but refuses to touch GPL affero'd code with a 3 meter pole.
I like it in principle, but I don't feel like it's a good solution in practice, at least until we get some cases going before a judge to see how it gets interpreted.
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-affero-gpl.en.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-affero-gpl.en.html
- quadrangle 11y agoAGPL is perfectly clear: if you make source available under AGPL, you are in compliance. There's nothing to worry about. Plus, nobody ever sues you initially over (A)GPL compliance, they just ask you to come into compliance and only sue you if you refuse. Just release the source initially, and you're all set. Why is this hard?