16 ms·
To establish in a semi-rigorous way the (btw obvious) relationship between coarsening in physics and in stacked neural networks, as was done long after the latt
by T-A 11y ago
To establish in a semi-rigorous way the (btw obvious) relationship between coarsening in physics and in stacked neural networks, as was done long after the latter became a thing [1][2], is at the same level as observing the analogy between Black-Scholes and diffusion. It's cute, but it does not turn the subject into physics.
It should go without saying that you can not, by definition, resolve fundamental questions about mathematical physics by experiment.
The APS took a stand on climate change years ago [3]. It was clear enough to make Harold Lewis [4] and Ivar Glaever [5] resign in protest.
P.S. Belief propagation was first proposed by Judea Pearl in 1982 [6]. The closest connection to physics one could realistically claim is that Pearl got a M.Sc. in physics before turning (back) to electrical engineering and then AI.
[1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3124 http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3124
[2] http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3831 http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3831
[3] http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/climate/ http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/climate/
[4] http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/15/a-physicists-climate-complaints/?_r=0 http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/15/a-physicists-cl...
[5] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/climatechange/8786565/War-of-words-over-global-warming-as-Nobel-laureate-resigns-in-protest.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/climatecha...
[6] https://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/1982/AAAI82-032.pdf https://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/1982/AAAI82-032.pdf
- selimthegrim 11y agoSome good points, but you refused to address my Bethe Ansatz comment (cf. http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5055 http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5055, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-theory_(physics)#Reconciling_twisted_K-theory_and_S-duality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-theory_(physics)#Reconciling...) and in any case, I recall Schwinger resigning from the APS over cold fusion. Doesn't make cold fusion right. Also I didn't realize the ground state of the Hubbard model wasn't mathematical physics? Spin liquids aren't mathematical physics? This is the same old story where people like des Cloizeaux and Pearson discovered bosonization and helped establish the long tradition of condensed matter people studying the Heisenberg model and making useful contributions to "high energy" physics and basically get ignored In the end my point is that you loved the idea of changing the world more than you loved physics. There's nothing wrong with that.