2 ms·

That wasn't really my point here. Explicitly exposing facts is the attitude I'd expect from this community, instead of ridiculing and wrongly correlating it wi

by dataker 11y ago

That wasn't really my point here. Explicitly exposing facts is the attitude I'd expect from this community, instead of ridiculing and wrongly correlating it with ideologies.

scott_s 11y ago
The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Putting that aside, I share pjc50's bemusement that arguing for equal pay qualifies as a "hidden agenda". I also don't find speculation the same as "explicitly exposing facts".
- innguest 11y ago
  You're blind because you're an r-selected leftist with a tiny amygdala and hence barely any capacity to recognize a threat in the making. (This is just my hypothesis, don't take it seriously) Put the pieces together. She's a woman. She confuses differences in personal productivity for "fairness and justice" (clear mark of a leftist). She tweets a story larger than 140 characters (low IQ, as most leftists). She acts naively as if protection from the law will protect her from companies with lawyers (leftist delusion). Don't beat yourself up about not seeing the threat. r/K selection strategy basically breeds two different species of people. I can't imagine what it must be like to be like you and not see that communism is taking over through Cultural Marxism, either. > The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Is that the principle? I'll prove to you you're a leftist hypocrite. 'The term "misogynist" is often used to dismiss people who argue against the idea that feminists work for equality' And yet leftists are the biggest offenders of this principle. They are the first to call people misogynists, anti-semites, homophobic, etc. Those are pure ad-hominem that the leftist never cares to correct; until they THINK they found something like that being done by the other side. Except, dear scott_s, that SJW is NOT name calling. It is accurate labeling. Just like saying leftist isn't name calling. We just don't want to talk ad infinitum about your flavor of democracy - it's wrong in principle (mob rule). An SJW is a person that has internalized key teachings of the Frankfurt School and other Cultural Marxist doctrines through the current education system and the media. That's all. And it shows, in you, in the girl tweeting about Google salary spreadsheets, and every other leftist. It shows.
mwfunk 11y ago
Using the term SJW is revealing an ideology, as surely as using M$ in a thread about Microsoft. You might not subscribe to it but most people are going to jump to that conclusion.

by dataker 11y ago

That wasn't really my point here. Explicitly exposing facts is the attitude I'd expect from this community, instead of ridiculing and wrongly correlating it with ideologies.

scott_s 11y ago

The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Putting that aside, I share pjc50's bemusement that arguing for equal pay qualifies as a "hidden agenda". I also don't find speculation the same as "explicitly exposing facts".

innguest 11y ago
You're blind because you're an r-selected leftist with a tiny amygdala and hence barely any capacity to recognize a threat in the making. (This is just my hypothesis, don't take it seriously) Put the pieces together. She's a woman. She confuses differences in personal productivity for "fairness and justice" (clear mark of a leftist). She tweets a story larger than 140 characters (low IQ, as most leftists). She acts naively as if protection from the law will protect her from companies with lawyers (leftist delusion). Don't beat yourself up about not seeing the threat. r/K selection strategy basically breeds two different species of people. I can't imagine what it must be like to be like you and not see that communism is taking over through Cultural Marxism, either. > The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Is that the principle? I'll prove to you you're a leftist hypocrite. 'The term "misogynist" is often used to dismiss people who argue against the idea that feminists work for equality' And yet leftists are the biggest offenders of this principle. They are the first to call people misogynists, anti-semites, homophobic, etc. Those are pure ad-hominem that the leftist never cares to correct; until they THINK they found something like that being done by the other side. Except, dear scott_s, that SJW is NOT name calling. It is accurate labeling. Just like saying leftist isn't name calling. We just don't want to talk ad infinitum about your flavor of democracy - it's wrong in principle (mob rule). An SJW is a person that has internalized key teachings of the Frankfurt School and other Cultural Marxist doctrines through the current education system and the media. That's all. And it shows, in you, in the girl tweeting about Google salary spreadsheets, and every other leftist. It shows.

mwfunk 11y ago

Using the term SJW is revealing an ideology, as surely as using M$ in a thread about Microsoft. You might not subscribe to it but most people are going to jump to that conclusion.