5 ms·

I'm not taking Google's position, but couldn't Erica have a hidden agenda on this initiative? Is it only about transparency? She does seem like a SJW and, if a

by dataker 11y ago

I'm not taking Google's position, but couldn't Erica have a hidden agenda on this initiative? Is it only about transparency? She does seem like a SJW and, if any discrepancies in compensation were found between gender/race/... , Google would be ultimately screwed. Plus, with such large dataset, one could fallaciously assume differences without considering different countries,positions,...

pjc50 11y ago
Equal pay is still regarded as a sinister "hidden agenda"? It's 2015, guys.
- dataker 11y ago
  If you're intellectually honest, yes, still is a hidden agenda.
  - pjc50 11y ago
    What does this even mean in this context? Being interested in whether you're illegally discriminated against is intellectual dishonesty?
  - Merovius 11y ago
    Intelectually honestly: No. Agenda, yes. Hidden? No? It's a very unhidden, open, public agenda, when you lobby for transparency of pay.
woah 11y ago
"The sjw's are out to get me!!"
- dataker 11y ago
  That wasn't really my point here. Explicitly exposing facts is the attitude I'd expect from this community, instead of ridiculing and wrongly correlating it with ideologies.
  - scott_s 11y ago
    The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Putting that aside, I share pjc50's bemusement that arguing for equal pay qualifies as a "hidden agenda". I also don't find speculation the same as "explicitly exposing facts".
    - innguest 11y ago
      You're blind because you're an r-selected leftist with a tiny amygdala and hence barely any capacity to recognize a threat in the making. (This is just my hypothesis, don't take it seriously) Put the pieces together. She's a woman. She confuses differences in personal productivity for "fairness and justice" (clear mark of a leftist). She tweets a story larger than 140 characters (low IQ, as most leftists). She acts naively as if protection from the law will protect her from companies with lawyers (leftist delusion). Don't beat yourself up about not seeing the threat. r/K selection strategy basically breeds two different species of people. I can't imagine what it must be like to be like you and not see that communism is taking over through Cultural Marxism, either. > The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Is that the principle? I'll prove to you you're a leftist hypocrite. 'The term "misogynist" is often used to dismiss people who argue against the idea that feminists work for equality' And yet leftists are the biggest offenders of this principle. They are the first to call people misogynists, anti-semites, homophobic, etc. Those are pure ad-hominem that the leftist never cares to correct; until they THINK they found something like that being done by the other side. Except, dear scott_s, that SJW is NOT name calling. It is accurate labeling. Just like saying leftist isn't name calling. We just don't want to talk ad infinitum about your flavor of democracy - it's wrong in principle (mob rule). An SJW is a person that has internalized key teachings of the Frankfurt School and other Cultural Marxist doctrines through the current education system and the media. That's all. And it shows, in you, in the girl tweeting about Google salary spreadsheets, and every other leftist. It shows.
  - mwfunk 11y ago
- innguest 11y ago
  > "The sjw's are out to get me!!" That has a lot more teeth than the leftist equivalent "the terrorist are out to get me!!". Remember, the TSA has a failure rate of 95% according to Homeland Security: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/01/tsa-fails-95-percent-tests-homeland-security_n_7485558.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/01/tsa-fails-95-percen... And on top of that, our borders to the South are open which means terrorists could come in from Mexico as well. However, despite the TSA being admittedly just security theater and the US borders being wide open there hasn't been another terrorist attack ever since the 9/11 false flag. But you and your leftist comrades are still shouting "The terrorists are out to get me!!". I really, honestly, personally think that you are the idiot here, not those rightfully raising the SJW flag right after an SJW almost sinked Reddit. Get a grip.

by dataker 11y ago

pjc50 11y ago

Equal pay is still regarded as a sinister "hidden agenda"? It's 2015, guys.

dataker 11y ago
If you're intellectually honest, yes, still is a hidden agenda.
- pjc50 11y ago
  What does this even mean in this context? Being interested in whether you're illegally discriminated against is intellectual dishonesty?
- Merovius 11y ago
  Intelectually honestly: No. Agenda, yes. Hidden? No? It's a very unhidden, open, public agenda, when you lobby for transparency of pay.

woah 11y ago

"The sjw's are out to get me!!"

dataker 11y ago
That wasn't really my point here. Explicitly exposing facts is the attitude I'd expect from this community, instead of ridiculing and wrongly correlating it with ideologies.
- scott_s 11y ago
  The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Putting that aside, I share pjc50's bemusement that arguing for equal pay qualifies as a "hidden agenda". I also don't find speculation the same as "explicitly exposing facts".
  - innguest 11y ago
    You're blind because you're an r-selected leftist with a tiny amygdala and hence barely any capacity to recognize a threat in the making. (This is just my hypothesis, don't take it seriously) Put the pieces together. She's a woman. She confuses differences in personal productivity for "fairness and justice" (clear mark of a leftist). She tweets a story larger than 140 characters (low IQ, as most leftists). She acts naively as if protection from the law will protect her from companies with lawyers (leftist delusion). Don't beat yourself up about not seeing the threat. r/K selection strategy basically breeds two different species of people. I can't imagine what it must be like to be like you and not see that communism is taking over through Cultural Marxism, either. > The term "Social Justice Warrior" is often used to dismiss people who argue against discrimination in various arenas. If you want to be taken seriously in discussions about discrimination, then perhaps avoid it. Is that the principle? I'll prove to you you're a leftist hypocrite. 'The term "misogynist" is often used to dismiss people who argue against the idea that feminists work for equality' And yet leftists are the biggest offenders of this principle. They are the first to call people misogynists, anti-semites, homophobic, etc. Those are pure ad-hominem that the leftist never cares to correct; until they THINK they found something like that being done by the other side. Except, dear scott_s, that SJW is NOT name calling. It is accurate labeling. Just like saying leftist isn't name calling. We just don't want to talk ad infinitum about your flavor of democracy - it's wrong in principle (mob rule). An SJW is a person that has internalized key teachings of the Frankfurt School and other Cultural Marxist doctrines through the current education system and the media. That's all. And it shows, in you, in the girl tweeting about Google salary spreadsheets, and every other leftist. It shows.
- mwfunk 11y ago
innguest 11y ago
> "The sjw's are out to get me!!" That has a lot more teeth than the leftist equivalent "the terrorist are out to get me!!". Remember, the TSA has a failure rate of 95% according to Homeland Security: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/01/tsa-fails-95-percent-tests-homeland-security_n_7485558.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/01/tsa-fails-95-percen... And on top of that, our borders to the South are open which means terrorists could come in from Mexico as well. However, despite the TSA being admittedly just security theater and the US borders being wide open there hasn't been another terrorist attack ever since the 9/11 false flag. But you and your leftist comrades are still shouting "The terrorists are out to get me!!". I really, honestly, personally think that you are the idiot here, not those rightfully raising the SJW flag right after an SJW almost sinked Reddit. Get a grip.