I've never really found "E" games based around developer-crafted content to be very interesting, because it's simply not sustainable. At best you get a univers

I've never really found "E" games based around developer-crafted content to be very interesting, because it's simply not sustainable. At best you get a universe that keeps you interested for a few weeks and at worst you just get thousands of copy-pasted fetch quests. Anarchy Online and Earth and Beyond were mildly interesting, but that's about it. I don't think PvP-as-a-necessity is inherently bad in a sandbox exploration game. If anything, it's good: other players will always be more interesting to compete against, whether by direct combat, economic competition, or diplomacy, than AI NPCs. IMO the only way to get a sustainable game that consistently produces interesting content is to rely on the players. In my experience the primary aversion to PvP comes from games that weren't designed from the ground up to be about PvP, but had it forced into the system in a way that was simply not enjoyable or interesting. EVE Online was "so close, yet so far" to this ideal, in that it got a lot of things very right but designed the economy too much around grind and spent the past few years focusing too heavily on strategic combat with capital ships instead of individual players.