well, i brought sml into it originally. all i really meant was that it looked more like sml (+ java) than ocaml (if that makes any sense - yeti doesn't seem to

well, i brought sml into it originally. all i really meant was that it looked more like sml (+ java) than ocaml (if that makes any sense - yeti doesn't seem to have the kind of sophistication ocaml has for handling typed objects, for example). but i'm no expert - i'm happy to see people expand and improve on what i wrote.