4 ms·
I think the term is isomorphic, but I am not sure. For Ruby you can look at http://voltframework.com http://voltframework.com - uses Opal underneath.
by seivan 11y ago
I think the term is isomorphic, but I am not sure.
For Ruby you can look at http://voltframework.com http://voltframework.com - uses Opal underneath.
- sgrove 11y agoI believe isomorphic has fallen out of favor (as it's being reclaimed for its original specific meaning) compared to Universal.
- abritinthebay 11y agoon HN maybe. Nowhere else.
- girvo 11y agoInterestingly, on a number of libraries and blogs I've come across recently, too. It seems to be gaining at least _some_ ground.
- abritinthebay 11y agoPerhaps but it won't help it's case that it's actually wrong. Isomorphic is correct - they share similar structures but often aren't the exact same. Universal implies a level of parity on server and client that just isn't there in almost all apps that are isomorphic. It's just plain wrong.