Oh, I can play "snarky HN comment" too! Ahem... Typical. Privacy! (until people I disagree with have their privacy taken). The Free Speech/Equal Rights rema

Oh, I can play "snarky HN comment" too! Ahem... Typical. Privacy! (until people I disagree with have their privacy taken). The Free Speech/Equal Rights remarks weren't about this case. The GP's comment was alluding to them and comparing them to Privacy, which was what was being discussed. Your remarks about Free Speech and Equal Rights are pointless and immaterial. > Having a lack of sympathy for someone who committed a crime (in this case a contract violation) Just curious, what crime did they commit in signing up for AM? What proof do you have that they did sign up? What proof do you have that the released data will be accurate? What contract did they violate by signing up for AM? I'm curious to know what proof you have besides assumptions to make a bold statement that anyone mentioned in the released data is immediately guilty of something. > Do you think it would be better for us to feel more empathy for contract breakers than for those whose marriages have been adversely affected? Do you think it would be better for us to find people guilty until proven innocent, or innocent until proven guilty?