> But I don't think it has anything to do with Pao's resignation. I agree. When I read the post, the mentions of Pao seemed very out of place, with respect to

> But I don't think it has anything to do with Pao's resignation. I agree. When I read the post, the mentions of Pao seemed very out of place, with respect to the flow. The meat of the post was interesting, but the attempt to connect it to Pao's departure felt like a big (and unnecessary) stretch.