5 ms·
The one group of people for whom I feel exactly no sympathy in all of this is the owners, investors and employees of AshleyMadison. Anyone who creates a site s
by duncan_bayne 11y ago
The one group of people for whom I feel exactly no sympathy in all of this is the owners, investors and employees of AshleyMadison.
Anyone who creates a site specifically to encourage and facilitate adultery deserves everything he or she gets.
- ChiperSoft 11y agoIf they didn't provide it, someone else would (and do). Like it or not, there is a demand for those sites.
- duncan_bayne 11y agoSure, but do those facts alter the (im)morality of their behavior?
- cozuya 11y agoJudge not?
- itistoday2 11y agoJudge not Hitler, lest you be judged for your poorly prepared pancakes.
- jarman 11y agoI don't have problem with 'encourage and facilitate' - blame lies 100% on one committing adultery. But they deserve being hunted down by lynch mob of defrauded cheaters for that removal fee extortion.
- duncan_bayne 11y agoHow does that work? If I sell you a gun knowing you're going to commit murder with it, am I not also morally culpable?
- jarman 11y agoAdultery is contract breach - you are not culpable unless you are part of that contract Murder is rights violation - you are in 'contract' by being human in society - you always can be culpable
- duncan_bayne 11y agoI think you may be confusing morally culpability with legal culpability. If you encourage someone to commit adultery, you are morally culpable, just as if you encourage someone to commit murder, you are morally culpable. The only difference is that, in the case of murder, you are also legally culpable.
- jarman 11y agoNo, I am not, I was talking purely from morality standpoint. >If you encourage someone to commit adultery, you are morally culpable Apparently we just happen to have different views. For me, adultery encouragement is unsympathetic act, but does not fit criteria for being amoral.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]