Your posts come across as overly defensive, which doesn't help your argument. I am not attacking you, yet you seem to believe I am. The UEA Climate Research Un

Your posts come across as overly defensive, which doesn't help your argument. I am not attacking you, yet you seem to believe I am. The UEA Climate Research Unit is a small research organization, consisting of maybe 20-30 climatologists at most. (I can't check. They took their web site down.) Yet you claim that the international consensus of 2000-3000 scientists is rendered invalid by maybe 1% of them employing dubious methods. I'm aware that the CRU dataset is an important one in climate research, but if this was truly a catastrophic problem with the conclusion, then I would expect to see hundreds of scientists withdrawing their opinions. Although some scientists have done this, there have not been many, and I understand this is more of a defensive move.