My favorite part about this article is " Ms. Tam said that, in hindsight, “there was probably more we could have included about Ms. Pao and some of her misstep

My favorite part about this article is " Ms. Tam said that, in hindsight, “there was probably more we could have included about Ms. Pao and some of her missteps at Reddit.” Mr. Isaac agreed: “I wish I had included other reasons behind Ellen’s ouster.” Those angles have been covered in many other Times stories, both noted. " I read this as "In hindsight, we could have re-edited the article we already continually edit but we wont." (because doing that now would somehow be wrong?) The whole thing smells.