3 ms·
I don't know why you contrast violence and rape, as rape implies violence. And the squemishness about rape doesn't have to say anything about the viewers attitu
by kryptiskt 11y ago
I don't know why you contrast violence and rape, as rape implies violence. And the squemishness about rape doesn't have to say anything about the viewers attitude to sex on the screen. I don't mind movie sex at all, and I abhor 99% of all movie rape or threat thereof. It seems like it's the singular way that hack writers know how to put women in peril, and it's nearly always played for cheap drama and thrills.
As for why violence goes down easier. The violence that is done in blockbuster movies has little to do with real violence, it is extremely stylized, it is about as far from reality as romantic movie sex is from real sex. And it is even more so in superhero movies.
- snarfy 11y ago> I don't know why you contrast violence and rape, as rape implies violence. No, it does not. There are many instances of rape without violence e.g. adult with an unwilling minor coerced into having sex.
- jipumarino 11y agoDo you really not consider that an act of violence?
- SCHiM 11y agoI'd consider that a violent act, but it is very different form the kind of violence displayed on your tv screen, which is the original point.