3 ms·

How many helicopters crash because of birds, and how many more birds are there than drones?

• sebastianavina 11y ago
  birds arent made of aluminium and copper, and birds are aware of the surroundings, and usually fly away the steel/noisy steel monsters.
• dogma1138 11y ago
  You can't control birds, you can control idiots who are flying drones in what common sense would dictate to be a restricted zone. This argument is on the same level as "people die due to lighting strikes every year, so why do we need lighting catchers on buildings?" Or better yet why have surge protection at all? This is blocking an ambulance level of dickery here sorry and there is no way around it.
• bradleyland 11y ago
  Where risk to human life is concerned, each individual's perception of the risk-reward trade-off involved in regulation will vary. Evidence of this can be found at every airport in the country. So I can see where you're coming from here. However, the position you're taking puts you on the side of: people should be allowed to fly drones in an area where aircraft are responding to an emergency (a wildfire) that puts other lives at risk. Any drone not flying in coordinated effort to actually put out the fire is of a priority that is very, very distant to that of the firefighting aircraft. At least by my measure, and I'm in the camp that believes the TSA should be abolished. Any statistical analysis of helicopter bird strikes won't negate the fact that having drones in the area of operation increases the chance that a pilot may lose their life to a collision with a drone that serves no purpose than to populate YouTube with riveting footage of a disaster. Is an increase of even 1 in a million worth that? Not by my account it isn't.
• omginternets 11y ago
  How many birds try to get near helicopters for a better shot?