> Even someone who supports slavery would likely be against kidnapping and mistreatment. I mean, they didn't just show up one day. But yeah, I just met hyperbo

> Even someone who supports slavery would likely be against kidnapping and mistreatment. I mean, they didn't just show up one day. But yeah, I just met hyperbole with hyperbole. > But why are you suddenly talking about corporate data use? Advertising happens with or without that data. I think you can opt out of a lot of ads. I don't watch television often and as stated have a large amount of blocking software installed. I don't read magazines and have limited exposure to billboards as I live in a rural areas. Data is the scary bit and it was mentioned in the article. Selling user data is morally ambiguous. Gun to my head, I come down on the side that it is probably wrong. Seeing an ad briefly while you steal a taylor swift song off youtube is different than the permanence of someone owning a silo of your personal intimate data. Also, this data is used to create a profile of you which (outside of the 1984 scenario) is used to sell you adverts. This is pretty shitty. Once again, I try to maintain my own privacy on the internet and try to safeguard my data as much as possible and while I think it is a shitty practice, I think people should be responsible for themselves.