4 ms·
I can't because I don't know enough about all the diff types of unions. In any case, that's irrelevant. What you're suggesting is that having an ideal and worki
by omouse 17y ago
I can't because I don't know enough about all the diff types of unions. In any case, that's irrelevant. What you're suggesting is that having an ideal and working towards it is a waste of time.
- anamax 17y ago> I can't because I don't know enough about all the diff types of unions. In other words, you don't know enough to support your position. There's nothing particularly wrong with that, but .... > In any case, that's irrelevant. What you're suggesting is that having an ideal and working towards it is a waste of time. It's quite relevant. Unions have been tried many times and the end result has always had certain characteristics. If you're going to argue that this time will be different, you have to explain why and what you're going to do different. And that's where background knowledge is required. No, it's not enough to "believe" - Tinkerbelle logic doesn't work in the real world.