3 ms·
That's really interesting. Deserving of a top-level submission, too, I think. May I ask what your plan is for defending lessons against cranks, crusading ideol
by pervycreeper 11y ago
That's really interesting. Deserving of a top-level submission, too, I think.
May I ask what your plan is for defending lessons against cranks, crusading ideologues, and the less-than-knowledgeable once it gets more adoption? Other collaborative projects such as Wikipedia have suffered as a result of this, but I noticed in your talk that your aim is to maintain "higher" quality than Wikipedia or even Stack Exchange and Quora. I'm curious how this can be accomplished once the user base expands beyond its initial network.
Congrats on this year's IMO result!
- expii 11y agoExpii uses voting (like Reddit, Quora, Stack Overflow, etc) to identify the best content. After that, since we have the luxury of focusing only on the "heavy-hitter" topics which at least 100 million people need to know, there really aren't that many topics. When we do reach the size at which quality is an issue, we can simply moderate the topics in-house. Wikipedia cannot do this because their objective is to cover 100 million topics (breadth), and so in-house moderation doesn't scale. Our objective is depth: we ultimately want to provide the absolute best free interactive lessons on every heavy-hitter topic in the world. :) Thanks for your well-wishes!