Overuse and broad use have made the term useless anyway. Aside from that, I do have an objection to the term: real advocates for social justice are doing somet

Overuse and broad use have made the term useless anyway. Aside from that, I do have an objection to the term: real advocates for social justice are doing something constructive. Literal warriors make war, which is destructive. That may have grim uses, but it isn't preferable to make our civil society as hostile as a war zone. Why do we need to appropriate the trappings of literal warriors, and why can't we embrace constructiveness instead of associating advocacy with destruction?