> I wouldn't be interested in readinh an article called "I how I almost saved the Internet" The old title was "how I nearly almost saved the Internet starring

> I wouldn't be interested in readinh an article called "I how I almost saved the Internet" The old title was "how I nearly almost saved the Internet starring afl-fuzz and dnsmasq" That title gives enough detail to be interesting while still being a bit cheeky -- and the article itself is a bit cheeky. That cheekiness makes the article all the more fantastic, IMO. The current title of "Finding a vulnerability in dnsmasq using afl-fuzz," while a factually accurate description, reads like a dry research paper. Anyway, there are situations where changing the title is appropriate. I just don't think this was one of them.