> Yes, "rich" people can get there "unfairly", but it turns out "just take it from them" is really a stupid idea. Who said "just take it from him?" I certainly

> Yes, "rich" people can get there "unfairly", but it turns out "just take it from them" is really a stupid idea. Who said "just take it from him?" I certainly didn't. I don't know the complexities of the case, the law, etc. I'm just surprised people rally around this guy like he's a common man sticking it to those rich plutocrats. When, in fact, it kind of sounds like the exact opposite. Also: He doesn't have "it." If anything, the argument would be that he should be prevented from creating an economic disaster just so he can jump from "pretty damn wealthy" to "unbelievably wealthy."