3 ms·
Lots of missions and mission phases don't require bigger antennas. Look at http://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html http://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html for current usag
by hga 11y ago
Lots of missions and mission phases don't require bigger antennas. Look at http://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html http://eyes.nasa.gov/dsn/dsn.html for current usage of the Deep Space Network. As I type this, 3 smaller dishes in Goldstone are handling 4 Mars missions, all solar powered, Odyssey at 14.22 kb/s. At Canberra, the only active dish is a small one, receiving data at 159 b/s from Voyager 2 (!). Which, I grant, doesn't have a lot to say right now.
3 sites, 1 big dish and 3 smaller ones at each, except for a 4th smaller one at Goldstone, that's a serious investment and I gather enough for now, especially since satellite technology now allows storing massive amounts of data (8 GB for New Horizons) for download as the mission and ground stations allow. Note also that after New Horizons finishes downloading the data from its flyby in November 2016, it won't have a lot to say unless and until its Kuiper belt object flyby.
- rohit89 11y agoFair enough. I had not realized that NH could send data at a faster rate when bandwidth was available. I wondered about the point of having 8 gb storage when you had such low speeds - it would take years to download.
- InclinedPlane 11y agoAs for the storage capacity, that's dictated by the amount of science collected. Who cares how long it takes to download? It's taken 11 years from mission inception for New Horizons to get built, launched, and get to Pluto. What's a year or two more?