I agree with you. To take the original ruling a step further towards absurdity, why not make ISPs filter out any traffic even mentioning the word grooveshark. A

I agree with you. To take the original ruling a step further towards absurdity, why not make ISPs filter out any traffic even mentioning the word grooveshark. And don't forget those pesky cables running from an exchange to your house carrying those bits, why not force the local exchanges to filter that traffic. Computer monitor makers; how about forcing them to not display the word grooveshark. The further and further you get from the origin (content producers/hosts), the more ridiculous the claim sounds. But the expectation is somehow different.