4 ms·
I haven't studied economics, so forgive me a naive question: What if the "interference" with action X is introducing a new alternative at time T that person A p
by qu4z-2 11y ago
I haven't studied economics, so forgive me a naive question: What if the "interference" with action X is introducing a new alternative at time T that person A prefers over the original? (Perhaps that's not strictly within the definition of "interference" in this case?)
- logicchains 11y agoInterference is generally defined as physical interference of some sort, using violence or the threat thereof to prevent the action. If action X introduced a new alternative that person A preferred, then it wouldn't require violence as person A would consent to it if they viewed it as better than the alternative.