4 ms·
> ...but that doesn't make it practical... If I had a dime for every penny of damage caused when people downplay the practicality of attacks against deployed c
by dlitz 11y ago
> ...but that doesn't make it practical...
If I had a dime for every penny of damage caused when people downplay the practicality of attacks against deployed crypto...
75 hours is enough time to attack a laptop left plugged in at the office over a 3-day weekend, and there's no reason why you'd have to attack only one laptop at a time.
The paper also says, "capturing traffic for 52 hours already proved to be sufficient", so it's not like 75 hours is some hard minimum.
Also:
"Our attack is not limited to decrypting cookies. Any data or information that is repeatedly encrypted can be recovered."
"We can break a WPA-TKIP network within an hour."
RC4 is dead, dead, dead. As with MD5, the writing's been on the wall for a while now, and attacks are only going to get better.
- yuhong 11y agoThe attack numbers are under artificially generated network traffic.
- gipsies 11y agoYes, but we present several techniques on how to generate these amounts of data. For TLS and HTTPS you can use JavaScript. For WPA-TKIP you need control of one TCP connection, and that is enough to generate the data. We're not saying it's a point and click attack, but it's a very good reason to start worrying :)