3 ms·
What? The LICENSE file looks like the standard BSD 2-Clause, to me. EDIT: I read it more closely; it's not a standard BSD, but it's definitely open source, jus
by EddieRingle 11y ago
What? The LICENSE file looks like the standard BSD 2-Clause, to me.
EDIT: I read it more closely; it's not a standard BSD, but it's definitely open source, just non-commercial.
- TD-Linux 11y agoNon-commercial does not meet the OSI definition of open source.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- NeutronBoy 11y agoI was getting all geared up to argue with you, I looked up the OSI definition, and ... you're right. I wasn't aware the OSI had a definition, that'll be very useful!