3 ms·
Pay attention to the license. This is not open source as it's for noncommercial use only. Still interesting, just saying.
by metric10 11y ago
Pay attention to the license. This is not open source as it's for noncommercial use only. Still interesting, just saying.
- EddieRingle 11y agoWhat? The LICENSE file looks like the standard BSD 2-Clause, to me. EDIT: I read it more closely; it's not a standard BSD, but it's definitely open source, just non-commercial.
- TD-Linux 11y agoNon-commercial does not meet the OSI definition of open source.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- NeutronBoy 11y agoI was getting all geared up to argue with you, I looked up the OSI definition, and ... you're right. I wasn't aware the OSI had a definition, that'll be very useful!